Welcome Guest - Login / Register Forum - News - 17th July - Daily news

Hello admin.
I think for the growth of the share market, you have to sell shares at a minimum price set. And every day to raise the minimum.
For example, the minimum price for the sale of shares, today is 2 cents, 2.2 cents tomorrow, after tomorrow, 2.5 and ... In the same way until you reach 50
cents.

If you agree with the idea, bring it to the attention of administrators.

my English is not well.

CJM
Traffic Value: $360.70311 Malaysia

1 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 01:47

The 24 hours rule may still cause some kind of panic if a huge number of shares are put on sale. So, why not we have these ON TOP of the 24 hours rule..

Set a maximum number of shares (e.g. 100000) for a SINGLE listing.

If you wished to put more shares on sale, you would have to sell it at 125% of your last listing.

Only if:
1. 24 hours has lapsed after your last listing or
2. All shares of your last listing have been sold
Then only you can put them for sale at the current price.

What do you think?

pedrovigario
Traffic Value: $983.3735 Netherlands

0 like this post 1 people

18/07/2015 02:02

like said previosly...

1st - increase fees for 3%
2nd - fees are taken in moment that users put shares on market.

veeru5656
Traffic Value: $990.82825 India

5 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 02:06

finally some good news ....kudos to marc for looking into shares manipulation

benignocaden
Traffic Value: $13.63431 Mexico

1 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 02:13

deberian cambiar las captchas

Diego902
Traffic Value: $10.07425 Brazil

7 like this post 16 people

18/07/2015 02:28

We're (Infomodel,Slosumo and I) currently thinking of finding a good measure to prevent sharemarket manipulation.
We had a few ideas but all of them either gives the smaller or bigger shareholders some advantages.

Could any of you guys come up with a fair idea? We'll take your opinion into consideration.
We really need to come up with some kind of measures as right now it became a playground.
No matter how much progress we're making development-wise the shareprice only drops due to shareprice manipulations.

Control the market?
Totally wrong. The market is allready under control by the major shareholders pool as all together hold more then 50% of the shares.
What you guys have to do is to prove you know the business you are on. Bring the damn new products and your company will be atractive to investors. Until then the market reflects what your company is worth

right now it became a playground

I can only have a big laugh, that means what all of you have been in the past just kids wearing your dads pants while amassing all the shares you hold

thedark1233
Traffic Value: $1,815.30566 Morocco

3 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 02:35

Hey what about this Todo list written in December/January, maybe there is something interresting here that will increase revenues !
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/74988359/todolist.txt

MarcdeKoning - Administrator
Traffic Value: $468,983.12758 Netherlands

41 like this post 7 people

18/07/2015 04:20

Diego, you got a very big mouth for a guy that has a 7$ traffic value.

bpc1234
Traffic Value: $62,710.15909 United States

9 like this post 1 people

18/07/2015 04:47

We need a minimum traffic value or share amount to post in forum. Lots of dead weight who spend all day bitching and moaning and causing issues.

druth8x
Traffic Value: $22,417.44153 United States

9 like this post 2 people

18/07/2015 04:57

I think a Min Traffic Value to Post a New Topic.
Also, to help clean up and make discussions more lively, a separate forum for "Newbies".
This newbie section can actually be filled with $0 TV users opening threads. And, ppl can help them there. Important that they don't clog up the Last 20 threads though.

I still think, esp with such a steep learning curve and not providing really good ways to learn, we need to keep allowing them to post. Just need to keep them in the playground/outside at times. Doesn't mean at dinner we can't try to have good back and forth discussions with the "kids".

No disrespect at all intended.

CJM
Traffic Value: $360.70311 Malaysia

7 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 05:05

@druth8x Agreed. But not 100%. Some of the users with low TV have even more knowledge and experience than those with a few thousands of TV. I have seen someone with 30k TV asking when share price would go up.

So yeah, maybe put those users less than 30 days old there would be great.

druth8x
Traffic Value: $22,417.44153 United States

1 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 05:35

Yes. There are some intelligent low TV users as well as some misuse by the ones with TV.

Maybe, like I think with editable posts, a revokable privilege, and default edit whenever. Or at least the edit is sent to Mod Approval, ideally with highlighted changes (Microsoft has this).

Anyways, how about show that you should do more reading and less talking, then revoke their privilege, but still allow them in the playroom/outside and at the dinner table from time to time.

This would be up to the mods to decide. It's not a forum ban, but a forum relocation. And, makes it so we aren't discriminating based on TV, but on actual behavior. Even big boys & girls may have to spend time in the playroom/outside.

jagodinac123
Traffic Value: $390.26943 Serbia

6 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 06:55

It seems we began to recycle finally

Since last night, 0.01`s, 0.02`s and 0.05 recycled ads showing up now and then

Whether it`s us recycling or Slosumo unleashing them gradually, it`s nice to see them again!

MichaelKline
Traffic Value: $960.97608 United States

8 like this post 7 people

18/07/2015 07:00

It would be interesting to incorporate reputations.

0) A negative reputation, by down votes, can ban a user for a while based on vote affects to reputation. [Slowly increments to zero, allowing re-entry.]
1) Lowest positive [includes zero] reputation can only reply to existing posts.
2) Mid Reputation can create posts.
3) High Reputations can edit/mod their own posts.

Reputations are modified by positive/negative votes on post/replies.

missi
Traffic Value: $12,691.63746 Australia

12 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 07:28

@Michael .. I would only be concerned how people with personal grudges against another can be avoided. I admit Im not so much the big ideas kind of person ... but I imagine it could be easy for a group to unfairly vote someone down purely because of what they think of the username as there are people only disgaree because of WHO said the comment not what was actually contained in the post ...As it is there is no motivation aside from pure grudge .. but if it determined who could post it may actually be motivation for those grudge bearers to vote those they dont like down.

mlmindia
Traffic Value: $804.38371 India

1 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 07:29

@Marc

I suggested some months ago but disliked by most.
still suggesting again.

Put a 30% cap on either side/every day like real Markets work.
How it works ?

Suppose at 00:01 server time (19th july 2015) , the share price is $0.0119 - 0.012
Then for the whole day the trading cap will be at 0.0156 - 0.0084 (30% cap calculated)

once the market reaches the limit (higher or lower), trade can't happen outside the range.
After some hour, the market will naturally function inside the given range till 00:00 server time

Again on 20th july 00:01 server time, market cap for the day is calculated by the system
and all day, the market will operate inside the range.

30% looks very small compared to our stock price. But the actual range is 60%.
Think well, it can control the manipulation some how.

Dislikes are most welcome as always.

MichaelKline
Traffic Value: $960.97608 United States

1 like this post 0 people

18/07/2015 07:33

@missi

I was considering that, but don't really have a solution figured out yet.
It's just an idea.

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Forum - News - 17th July - Daily news

Subscribe to this Topic