Welcome Guest - Login / Register Forum - News - 25th August - News
25th August - News
Sticky threads
Latest Posts
1.
Discuss the news!
Brainstorm - stra
2.
News - Read Only
News - slosumo
3.
How long does it takes a…
Questions - DomingoX6
4.
payment to otcshare
Questions - alva5763
5.
change ltc withdraw address
Questions - DomingoX6
6.
Email confirmation ¡¡issue!!
Questions - slosumo
magnolian92
Traffic Value: $66.1159 India
27/08/2016
07:12
Here's the revised table of yesterday (25th Aug)Total ad issue sent: $1200 Group 0 was sent 10 x $0.001 + 5x $0.0005 ads Today's ad issue was sent: BAP Group …... Percent (x100) …... $Available …... No. Users …. $ Ads /User 100 to 1599 …........ 0,000 …........ 204.5875 …........ 16227 …........ 0,0125 1600 to 12k …........ 0,187 …........ 187 …........ 14196 …........ 0,0132 12000 to 24k …........ 0,025 …........ 25 …........ 1078 …........ 0,0232 24k to 48k …........... 0,030 …........ 30 …........ 672 …........ 0,0446 48k to 96k …........ 0,030 …........ 30 …........ 353 …........ 0,0850 96k to 180k …........ 0,070 …........ 70 …........ 188 …........ 0,3723 Its not fair .....same $30 distributed in 3rd and 4th groups' members however both groups have different number of people (about double).....why???... No need to justify....its unfair......I think Marc should think again..... enjoy the weekend...I hope it will resolve in next week, thanks
Axiantor
Traffic Value: $14,813.95087 Portugal
27/08/2016
07:29
Guys you have to account to sum of all BAP on each group to see the fairness. The $ available depends on that. Top groups are receiving less so if they make it more fair you'll receive even less.
magnolian92
Traffic Value: $66.1159 India
27/08/2016
07:50
@Axiantor Ok i have calculated.....the difference between total BAP of 4th and 5th group is very low ...its mean ...total member in 4th group is greater then the quota and total member in 5th group is less then quota....thus the difference of paid ads value is larger.... Am i getting right??...
gugakip
Traffic Value: $739.34329 Belgium
27/08/2016
08:31
You're wrong Axiantor, as far as I can read those numbers correctly. Group 48-96k BAP receives $0.08 and the ones who invested double the amount receive $0.37... that's not really what you're saying? You say that small users earn more but it doesn't seem like that here? I'm not that into PV anymore after everything so you can correct me if necessary of course.
muhammadarif
Traffic Value: $104.03772 Pakistan
27/08/2016
08:52
Dear Admin!To encourage the low group members, this restriction should be removed "Only users with 12,000 BAP or more can sell/buy RPs for/with BAP" because there is no attraction for small users to sell/buy RPs for/with BAP. Furthermore, he/she is also a member of trafficvalue team and both should be treat equally either he/she is in low group or higher. Thanks.
druth8x
Traffic Value: $22,417.44153 United States
27/08/2016
09:43
Those who are "complaining" seem to be truly misunderstanding how Ad Pool Distribution works and has always worked. Though, they do see something wrong, as I explain below. While I'm still not 100% sure, I'm still quite sure this is how it works. BAP Group …... Percent (x100) …... $Available …... No. Users …. $ Ads /User BAP Group: ALL members in the Group those with 0 buffer or 99.99% get the same $ & ads of each other. However, the more total BAP in your Group, the bigger part of the pie your group gets. BTW, to the person that asked: NO, it doesn't matter how they acquire the BAP. The BA 10% etc gets added to the Ad Pool Fund ($1000) and from there distributed. Percent: Whatever % of the BAP (I think Active, and 1600+) they get that % of the Ad Pool for Group Ads Money to share among them all. $Avl: This is the same % in $ form. No. Users: The $Avl gets divided evenly among all these users. $Ads/User: This is what you as a member will be given. Thus, if we had 380MIL Active BAP: 24K-48K: 11.4MIL BAP shared among ALL those 672 members OR 16,964BAP/member (which isn't possible, something is up there, they should be at a higher %, probably ~5%) 48K-96K: 11,4MIL BAP shared among ALL those 353 members OR 32,294BAP/member (which isn't possible, something is up there, they should be at a higher %, probably ~5.5%) 96K-180K: 26.6MMIL BAP shared among ALL those 188 members OR 141,489BAP/member (which I can't say is wrong, but it seems a tad high for an avg buffer, they probably should be lowered to ~5%) I'm not prepared to spend all the time looking at all groups right now, if someone wants to take my lead, feel free. However, based on %'s given, and even a very rough idea of how much BAP is in the system that the % is based on, clearly something got screwed up in calculating just how much BAP is in the Groups as at least 2 don't have enough BAP, and at least one probably has too much.
gugakip
Traffic Value: $739.34329 Belgium
27/08/2016
09:58
They look at total BAP in a group? That's new for me! I thought it was more like doubling the amount of money as you climb groups (that's how it worked a long time ago I think). Then I don't want to say that Axiantor is wrong, sorry mate
mkganesh
Traffic Value: $199.10914 India
28/08/2016
05:34
@druth8xYes your analysis seems to be right, distribution for group 12K - 24K, 24K -48K, 48K -96K seems to be way off as their average BAP based on 380Mil BAP only comes to 7343, 14136, 26912 respectively. Even for groups, 3mil - 6mil and 6mil to 20mil the distribution seems to be little off as their average BAP only comes to 2850000 and 5757575 respectively. So it looks like the money distribution of both 25th Aug, and 26th Aug have not been correct. If any Admins could please double check these two days ad issues, it would be great. Also, why not have a separate webpage for the ad issues, with that days active BAP, and active BAP of each group stored for easier checks? |