• Project Funding
• Invest
• Play Games
• Refer Friends
• Monitor
• Results
• Portfolio
• Fast Track Queue
• Forum

• 
• Advert: Generic
  Winning bid: N/A
• 
• Advert: Generic
  Winning bid: N/A
• 
• Advert: Generic
  Winning bid: N/A

Again a porn site on our login PV page

Sticky threads

Latest Posts

Beljalex Traffic Value: $3,515.97345 Canada 4 like this post 5 people 22/08/2014 18:09 Worst than the first one!!! PLEASE BAN THIS ADVERTISER colasander Traffic Value: $386,747.05153 Netherlands 12 like this post 4 people 22/08/2014 18:13 Ooooooooooo! Here we go again! It is just a butt, everybody has one!  Just look the other way! Poker Traffic Value: $206.16449 South Africa 4 like this post 0 people 22/08/2014 18:35 It's not just a butt...it's positioned strategically in a certain position and the butt is ready for action...if you know what I mean. If you want to have porn ads here on PaidVerts, then Jo must adjust the Terms of Service. pedrovigario Traffic Value: $983.3735 Netherlands 2 like this post 1 people 22/08/2014 18:46 I slapped that but... missi Traffic Value: $12,691.63746 Australia 3 like this post 0 people 22/08/2014 19:13 last night i had one that was full of sex pics too ... but then im probably over reacting to that too because its only penis, vaginas and people having sex and not even a hint in the capture or address to what  I was about to see. very embrarassing when you have people around you too. its beyond a joke really Jo Traffic Value: $8,649,585.93592 Spain 13 like this post 0 people 22/08/2014 20:04 We'll have to build some system to verify/approve ads before they enter circulation. Same with moderating captchas and copy & paste texts. biggeorge Traffic Value: $65.61617 United States 0 like this post 0 people 22/08/2014 22:46 I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.[Emphasis added.] —Justice Potter Stewart, concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964), regarding possible obscenity in The Lovers. inditech Traffic Value: $13,962.16825 Australia 0 like this post 0 people 22/08/2014 23:15 you will click 100 ads for .01 cents yet you won't click an ad worth 5$!!! Coz its a form of art, but if it was a pic of Jesus or Allah would you still click? A verification system will slow down returns, come on guys! Domen97 Traffic Value: $9,354.801 Slovenia 6 like this post 2 people 22/08/2014 23:27 I understand some of you guys are annoyed by those adds but just ignore them for those 30seconds and be happy someone purcashed add even if porngrphic content it's still a money for PaidVerts and you... Also i would reather click a site with a pornographic image than type in chaptas like vwvwvwvwvwvwvwvwvwvwv morlor Traffic Value: $1,412.85036 New Zealand 0 like this post 0 people 23/08/2014 02:21 Come on guys - it's like TV - if you don't like what is on, change to another channel - simple!   Stop complaining....... missi Traffic Value: $12,691.63746 Australia 3 like this post 0 people 23/08/2014 04:17 You cant always swap it out before you see it and refreshing the page does not guarantee it wont come back.Just like tv ... they have a terms of service, one of which is in regards to showing adult related material to a general audience. Just like it states in the TOS here that it is not allowed. If it was sent to target audiences who chose to and didnt mind seeing adult related material, whether it be porn, sexual connotation in your own personal opinion, then that would be cool.  To have it in the face of the general public, people are going to be offended or not happy seeing it for any reason and they have a right to feel that way. It is not ok to be putting it there, it is written in the TOS. Simple really no matter what your personal take on the images/sites that have  been complained about in a few forums posts or the people who speak up about their dislike of it. Jo will attend to it in a just way when he can because he does what he says so patience will be needed from us who are not impressed by the smutty pictures and sites.  KashLain Traffic Value: $253.72216 United States 2 like this post 0 people 01/12/2014 21:02 I am very tired of explaining about the naked women and this isn't a porn program....sigh And these are not works of art nursemorph Traffic Value: $1,491.12314 United Kingdom 4 like this post 0 people 01/12/2014 21:13 Personally, I'm not that bothered about the pictures of bottoms and such (provided they are wearing some kind of underwear) as I live on my own so don't need to worry about someone else seeing them and, spending a lot of time on the internet, I see worse than that most days. However, I do understand how and why it might offend some people, regardless of the reason beit religious grounds, embarrassment grounds, because children might accidentally see it or for moral reasons and I find it disappointing and sad and, frankly, out of order, that those who are offended by these pictures are being criticised for being offended by it. I do agree that some sort of approval needs to be done as there has been at least one occasion when an ad I viewed turned out to be a pornography site (full nudity, pictures of penetration etc etc) which has no place on this site, no matter what anyone who disagrees says. I am glad that Jo has posted and is taking this seriously and I thank him for paying attention colasander Traffic Value: $386,747.05153 Netherlands 1 like this post 0 people 01/12/2014 21:22 *history channel* Look at the date of opening this topic guys Beljalex Traffic Value: $3,515.97345 Canada 1 like this post 0 people 01/12/2014 23:42 Once again a member that did not search before posting.  Go the main topic about this problem. You will find how to post banners links if we want help sharehoders control panel members to act. Without information they cannot do anything.  Once more time, it is not a matter of debate if it is or not porn but adequacy to the site promoted.  Many members suggested to have more than fines and BAP retreived for these members violating TOS giving PV a really bad reputation. It's not a major issue in PV/MTV but it is bothering a lot of members.