Welcome Guest - Login / Register Forum - Brainstorm - A Plan To Drive People Crazy!
A Plan To Drive People Crazy!
Sticky threads
Latest Posts
1.
Paidverts ClickGird Not…
Brainstorm - slosumo
2.
Discuss the news!
Brainstorm - orlan12fish
3.
BOUNTY TASKS - Win BAP
Misc - klikdiva
4.
Mtv prizes
Misc - slosumo
5.
payment to otcshare
Questions - orlan12fish
6.
News - Read Only
News - slosumo
Jo
Traffic Value: $8,649,585.93592 Spain
18/06/2014
20:44
There is absolutely no difference in terms of sustainability... We simply set aside 49% of each deposit to be given back to the user over 28days. Same as we already do with the Bulk Ads plan, where 10% is set aside and simply returned to users.In addition to that limited fixed process; users get BAP and receive ads daily until it's all consumed. Absolutely no difference. --- But I think if we ever have time to implement this idea; we'll differentiate the ads. Maybe charge $10/ad pack, or even $25. And either deliver lots of ad views, or some special ad view process to "justify the price". So users are always buying advertising, just the mechanics behind the scenes are a bit different.
kc1989
Traffic Value: $1,238.07941 Singapore
19/06/2014
00:54
its good to have different amount of ad packs but do maintain the $1 ad packs.if were to change it,it is bad for the advertisers.its just my opinion.Jo please do not change the 3100 BAP for every $1 purchase.Thanks.
profitshare
Traffic Value: $5,649.9588 Philippines
19/06/2014
02:12
Hi Jo,one avenue that for some reason has been totally overlooked are login ads, member logs in at either MTV or PV and sees another member's ad for let's say 10 seconds before being forwarded to their account page. That can be implemented within seconds!! I have done so at 2 of my own programs and it creates a nice little bit of revenue for me. Prices should be around $10 for 24 hours, max of 3 ads/day build into a rotator! Another way of creating some much needed funds
MarcdeKoning - Administrator
Traffic Value: $468,983.12758 Netherlands
19/06/2014
06:01
I don't like giving people a lower return. Why change a winning system? We're growing, bringing in more cash so keep it like this.I believe I read somewhere we're talking about only 115% ROI. Why would people want to wait for at least a month and work hard for a 15 cent/per dollar profit? I know I wouldn't. Also I don't like the new rule you're trying to implement on the sharemarket in which you pay upfront when selling your shares. It means you always need to HAVE cash to sell your shares. So basically deposit new cash to get out or wait for dividends to sell small parts of your shares.
Bopyer
Traffic Value: $142,703.83456 Slovenia
20/06/2014
12:42
I read through whole pages and i will quote Brainy:I prefer that PaidVerts distances itself from HYIP world. Daily fixed return is not a good idea in my opinion. As another member said, processors like Paypal could be a lot more skeptical about the legitimacy of the business with fixed return. People would also be. I think the current plan is perfect with the 155% return with no fixed results. No guarantee of any return. You purchase ads and the returns with BAP are bonus. I sign under that.
hrjustinptc - Forum moderator
Traffic Value: $8,376.82638 United States
20/06/2014
13:26
Actually even with the current bulk ads there is a fixed 10% return over the first 10 days. That is much better then a fixed 49% over 28 day.
colasander
Traffic Value: $386,747.05153 Netherlands
20/06/2014
13:54
10% in 10 days is just 1% a day, while 49% in 28 days, is 1,75% a day hrjustinptc
hrjustinptc - Forum moderator
Traffic Value: $8,376.82638 United States
20/06/2014
14:03
Right I know I was just saying even now there is at least a small part of the return that is fixed.
Jo
Traffic Value: $8,649,585.93592 Spain
20/06/2014
14:15
As I said, no real difference. Just a part of each users deposit being returned to them.And whilst the return is less than the other plan, because you guaranteed get half your money back over 4weeks; you're only waiting on the variable payments for the rest. So there's a chance you might earn more quickly this way. And this would be a second ad option, we're not going to change Bulk Ads in any way. Choose whichever you prefer.
billonaire
Traffic Value: $1,171.6724 Argentina
24/06/2014
01:05
I totally agree with @Brainy to keep PaidVerts distances itself from HYIP world.and WAIT! what about that phenomenal product called "Experimental Funds"? If you've been in hundreds of money making opps for several years like myself, you will find easy to understand that this smart concept CAN change the rules of HYIP/Hybrids and can actually DRIVE PEOPLE CRAZY. We know it's right now like a walking dead product due to inactivity or slow motion but let's consider its weakness: 1-Inactivity/slow motion 2-low 1% refunds for pending investments 3-no value(ads) for investments placed at the bottom of pending list queue until they get repaid(normally several months EF should be integrated to an ads platform so when your investment gets wipeout, your ad starts to get exposure until the entire investment gets repaid and this way you get both ROI or ad value depending in your strategy to cashout early + your lack of fortune when unprofitable day occurs + your need of advertising. All covered I do not mean integrated to PV but maybe some idea related to login ads at MTV should be excellent. If we fix those 3 points mentioned about EF we would have an unbeatable ALREADY FAMILIAR product. A one that "Drives people crazy" + the Best ever HYIP/HYBRID COMPATIBLE WITH PP
Wjesiu
Traffic Value: $20,936.72553 Poland
24/06/2014
06:52
There could be also made a little tweak to the EF system, so instead of getting the 101% back to wallet in far far future, we could make use of our money in pending refunds faster and pay with them for BAP in PV
inditech
Traffic Value: $13,962.16825 Australia
24/06/2014
06:53
I would like to see PV finish it's plan for targeted advertising....just image how much credibility it will have with affiliate marketers i.e cpa, clickbank etcit would be nice to see PV as an advertising benchmark and not a seedy, money generating program that attracts hackers and trouble makers!
billonaire
Traffic Value: $1,171.6724 Argentina
24/06/2014
12:40
well @Wjesiu that's a good idea but I still agree that PV should be kept away from EF.I really think that PV is our connection to the "moral" online world EF is a Ferrari that lies right now behind the dust in the garage and has the potential to become a Rolls Royce overtime What a pitty anyway...
inditech
Traffic Value: $13,962.16825 Australia
30/06/2014
11:07
Ok, what about margin lending/loans! This idea extends from other users cashing out others users cash outs.for example, larger investors pool there "resources/MTV account" and a smaller investor deosits and amount and receives a margin loan at 1:100 eg 10 => 1000. Then the loan is repaid through the FT250 plan...
tupko
Traffic Value: $32,122.18249 Croatia (LOCAL Name: Hrvatska)
30/06/2014
16:36
Jo, with these HYIP ideas you are taking PV to the not very good direction, as I said yesterday, PV is not an investment opportunity, it's a goddamn PTC and let's keep it as much as possible that way. as many people said here keep PV away from HYIPish type of work. I see you want a plan to drive people crazy, so far your ideas are best applied for the new MTV's investment plans, some new lucrative and attractive investment plans would be a nice boost for mtv I guess. How about bringing daily payments back to some plans, or anything else you have in mind? tweaking with EF should result in boost to business too. Regarding PV, next goal should be targeted advertising as inditech said and implementing more advertising options like that on PV. let's make PV truly an ultimate PTC advertising site!
dan1989
Traffic Value: $76,730.43625 Portugal
30/06/2014
16:56
Agree with you about PV. PV as an advertising and not like a hyip.---- But about the daily earnings, I guess not. Why? Because MTV already have that, and we only receive micro cents per day (I know that that depends on the initial investment). I rather receive all in one chunk, rather then receiving micro cents per day. And the second reason is that some revenues will need to be sacrifice for paying daily earnings (I think), and that will slower down the Fast-track ETA. |