• Project Funding
• Invest
• Play Games
• Refer Friends
• Monitor
• Results
• Portfolio
• Fast Track Queue
• Forum

• 
• Advert: PS-WagCom65
  Winning bid: $12.00
• 
• Advert: PV-WagCom73
  Winning bid: $11.00
• 
• Advert: MTV-WagCom72
  Winning bid: $10.00

Controlling PV Growth...

Sticky threads

Latest Posts

miljons Traffic Value: $863.58519 Latvia 2 like this post 13 people 01/02/2015 07:47 I think,them more changes you make in Paidverts,then more people will move to digadz,becouse they will become more stable,without llimits,without swaps etc MichaelKline Traffic Value: $960.97608 United States 10 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:48 Jo: I have a better Idea, let's get that targeted ads system going so there is a real revenue source in the Paidverts portfolio. I will be posting some deep detailed ideas about how to accomplish this in the Brainstorm Category in the next few days. I hope you will take a look at them. forpXes Traffic Value: $4,616.96337 Slovenia 1 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:49 When the next bap swap comes Digadz will be  gone for some time already hikineet Traffic Value: $5,041.18779 Malaysia 3 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:49 I see my post was removed. Just to clarify: I didn't delete it my long ass post and I'm not retyping all that again. That is highly disappointing. I hope that just means a rogue moderator deleted it. Heck, even @Catt liked my post and she's a moderator. How did my post disappear? Put it back.  Did a moderator flag my post?  Catt Traffic Value: $1,193.5857 Brazil 1 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:50 @hikineet I liked your post and there was nothing wrong with it in my understanding. hikineet Traffic Value: $5,041.18779 Malaysia 5 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:51 Yes @Catt. Can you check in the shareholder panel to see what happened to it? Because I didn't press delete. It just seemed to have disappeared. My guess is that another moderator flagged my post or something.  Edit: Seems like mod @hrjustinptc accidentally deleted my post. Seriously? I thought like 3 moderators had to approve deletion of a post. So apparently a single moderator can delete another user's post? I don't think that's OK. I will have to reformat what you recovered. Catt Traffic Value: $1,193.5857 Brazil 0 like this post 2 people 01/02/2015 07:52 yes he just said he did by mistake and reposted it hrjustinptc - Forum moderator Traffic Value: $8,376.82638 United States 12 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:53 Totally my fault hikineet there was nothing wrong with your post. please forgive me I am not used to the delete being on every post now. Maybe we need to add a way to confirm after clicking that.  dguy Traffic Value: $15,993.01608 Canada 4 like this post 2 people 01/02/2015 07:53 FIRE THAT MODERATOR!! forpXes Traffic Value: $4,616.96337 Slovenia 0 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:54 Darknit Traffic Value: $3,211.07643 Sri Lanka 19 like this post 1 people 01/02/2015 07:55 It certainly revitalized the system, and generated a bucket load of turnover. And subsequently a huge injection for the system.And the share price spiked real quickly right up near the desired level, only a fraction of a cent short of the full 155 ROI.So, it was a successful exchange most definitely. Unclogging the system from the Christmas slowdown. And it's moved the business forwards. True it was indeed a success. But the the increased daily results was hugely due the "Fresh Cash" injected in, out of users own pocket. And yes then the users started to sell their shares for cash (even with losses)gradually , thereby making daily purchases increased. But I have my doubts if the same success could be expected if you are to do the same Swap again with in 12 months period. Coz then the investors will DO consider this "Short term Wonder" of thing "BAP Swap" and will look at it with "keep on happening every once in a while" attitude. People will have to keep on adjusting to these things every few months & eventually will loose "faith" because there will be no "Consistency or Stability" from their perspective. ---------------------------- The share price has been hampered due to slow "new" portfolio development. As we're setting up the offices, still trying to find additional staff, and the biggest factor of all is that we've spent the last 2months just trying to stabalize the system, to deal with our new found scale.... Our new server setup is working, and scaling. So that is very good. That's a big achievement (that the likes of DigAdz have failed to overcome) I hope for everyone's sake that you guys would start to work hard on finishing up the development of the products you keep on promising for a while now. ---------------------------- So I was thinking how we can improve things for any future BAP Exchanges, that are hopefully still a long way off; middle or end of the year is my goal. Keeping it as the last resort & make it happen the next year, would be IDEAL imo. ---------------------------- As the key point with the last exchange, is that debt has piled on incredibly quickly. We're up to 150% of last years debt, in just 1month. (And when we do the giant ad issue next week, that will multiply some more over the course of just another week or so!) ... So the level of time-saving definitely has room for improvement. This will keep on happening even with those limitations you recommend if you were to keep on using BAP Swap tool. Yes those limitations will give you anther 6 to 8 months, but not a permanent solution. ---------------------------- What are your comments? You need to push those developers MORE HARDER into finishing up those promised products (multiplayer poker etc...etc... ) REAL SOON. Or else buy all those games as you proposed soon enough and then give it a few months (like 3) after implementation to evaluate the results. If results are in favour of the business you got even more time to redo your business plan, if not go for the Swap immediately. Swap tool is useless (in the long run) & would only create "cyclic effect" without the proper additional tool such as "profitable revenue generating products", to aid it with. Keeping it as a final resort is fine & that limitation thing is also would definitely reduce the burden a bit from the aftermath of BAP Swap. (seriously impressed by your "Business Mind" & great tactics.) ---------------------------- Just an honest opinion based on the facts & whatever I can for-see, using my intellects. hikineet Traffic Value: $5,041.18779 Malaysia 13 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:56 My original post reformatted (after mod accidental deletion): Excellent post @Jo. I appreciate your detailed post and new ideas. I'm glad you're looking for ways to make MTV and its products even more sustainable than before.   When you say "For which I am considering as follows", do you mean you are considering it, or that you have already made up your mind and you just want to see how people will react?  I think your idea of limiting the bulk ad purchases to one purchase per day and the limit of each purchase is definitely going to add to the sustainability and will almost certainly decrease the amount of BAP and debt swaps necessary. My prediction is that this will be unpopular among a lot of people, but if we are talking purely on sustainability terms, this is absolutely great.  You write, and I quote: "At the point of the next BAP Exchange to limit Bulk Ad Purchases to one purchase per day, per user. And also limit the value of each purchase, as follows; On the exchange day.... $1 ad purchases, per user. Then every 7 days thereafter, double the daily limit."  Does this mean that let's say there is another BAP swap on July 1st, 2015. So 6 months from today. So when the BAP swap occurs, everyone, with no exception, if they want to reinvest, will have to start by investing naximum of $1 first day, then maximum of the next day is doubled that, and so on and so fourth? And every subsequent BAP swap it restarts at $1, then doubled next day, and so on so fourth? I just want clarification, that's all.  The next thing I want to address that you have written: "Users cannot fast sell their shares directly for BAP. Which should force the cash share price to crash;"  This implies that you will remove the 'Share to BAP' market. Am I right or wrong in my assumption? Just a neutral question. I take no side in this. Just trying to rationally discuss. Are you going to make it so that you can only buy BAP with MTV cash funds and fresh deposits and no longer allow people to convert their shares to BAP? Just want clarification.  The final thing I want to address from your post is the following that you have wrote: "So I was thinking how we can improve things for any future BAP Exchanges"  Off the top of my head, when you "announced the BAP swap", you didn't really announce it, it was first passed off as a suggestion, and everyone didn't want it to happen. Then you did it anyway (even though the majority wasn't in favor). When it was done, the majority actually liked that you did it anyway. I think one thing you shouldn't do is announce it and then do it 3 days later. Especially when it was passed off as "just an idea" when it was actually going to take place. Almost no one was ready, and most people couldn't take full advantage of it which was why many people were angry.  I'm not sure if it's good for MTV, but perhaps announce it earlier. If that's not possible, don't pass it off as a suggestion and then do it anyway. Say you're going to do it and then do it so that people don't feel as shocked by sudden decision.  Personally, I'm in favor of any policy implementation that improves the sustainability of MTV and your business. I'd rather know MTV is here in 30 years time than implementing risky policies that could destroy everything you and everyone here has worked for and have had faith in for a long time.  I think your ideas in this thread show that you want more sustainability in MTV and that is absolutely great and I support what you have written here. I think this may be an unpopular opinion but I'll save my breath because I really don't know.  My ending comment is that I hope you favor sustainability over risky growth more like you are pretty much writing here and finally, I love how interactive you are with members and that you are open to even unpopular opinions so long as they are well reasoned and not insults. If you could directly respond to this post in this thread, it would raise my respect for you even more.   Thanks for reading!  ~hikineet axl100 Traffic Value: $60.77536 Greece 2 like this post 6 people 01/02/2015 07:57 Jo, the higher grups that earn full-time money must click full-time too. So u bether divide the ads on 500-600 equal value ads on the top groups, 250-300 on the midle groups and 100-150 on the low groups. Everyone that dont want to click may use the plans or the shares to earn. yallit Traffic Value: $2,148.94717 Philippines 4 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:59 @druth8x, In order for the big members to get into a higher group quickly, they will have to sell their shares for a low BAP price. Due to a BAP demand, we'll see a reverse of the share price in the marketplace wherein the cash price will be higher than the BAP price. Those who are willing to give up their BAP in exchange for shares will get a quick profit since they'll be able to sell those shares for a higher cash value. dguy Traffic Value: $15,993.01608 Canada 4 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 07:59 @druth8x Well, the point to trying to win this "game" is b/c it is the only site out there that I trust can give income replacing results, non HYIPly, if you are willing to work and or invest and or wait. Well, I and many others do have other options. I'm a stock trader myself so I could use the money in this site to make money in the market. This is just a form of diversification and a bit of a time spender for me when the markets are slow. I'm sure many of the other people with income have options too and if they see that they can't make money or are restricted, then they might choose those options instead. Maybe that is what Jo wants nhice_01 Traffic Value: $312.03684 Philippines 1 like this post 3 people 01/02/2015 08:02 I'm BEGGING you JO to read my suggestions and comments, PLEASE. If you're going to do that you will create a huge downfall for your investors, thus preventing growth for them, if you're going to limit ad purchases to that point, all investors are looking forward on earning a large amount from this site. It will just be to a certain point that we will all start from scratch and will only have the chance to grow back to our groups after waiting for a long time.  Now, for the suggestions, even though it is not solicited. Why not reduce the ads that will be created on Bulk ad purchase?  That way it will lessen the load and making it lesser burden giving visits to sites that ad purchases make. You can also try to make an equivalence of... Giving us a choice whether: 30visits + 3100 BAPs = $1.05 Bulk ads OR, 50visits + 2100 BAPs = $1.05 Bulk ads MANDATORY 100 clicks to $0.0005 ads to each user that has BAP. You can set that and give a 10 BAPs fine for each ad unclicked including the mandatory 100 ads during the server time, that is another way making a safety net, that move will give PV a lot of budget for higher groups thus making it more sustainable as well. Increasing the BAP-Share exchange fee to 5%. That way all BAP that will be helping out creating larger scales of addition to higher value ads issued to users on higher BAP group. I still have a lot of ideas coming out of my head if you have time to talk. All of those came out of my BF and my ideas. If you need help, let's all reach out, and please create a forum exclusively for contributors not just bystanders that all knows is to BASH and COMPLAIN about what is happening. yusant1 Traffic Value: $230.68629 Indonesia 0 like this post 2 people 01/02/2015 08:08 Nice.... I'm joining! jordy186 Traffic Value: $868.5955 Netherlands 0 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 08:09 Cant it be considered to do more often a 10% bap swap instead of exchanging the full 100% of the baps to shares tjtan0929 Traffic Value: $203,540.80977 Malaysia 3 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 08:09 why the debt swap will happens one reason is sending too big ads to quickly get 155% roi in months another reason is shareholders are quickly making big profit in sharemarket and swapping shares into bap because PV only keep buying their shares and pushing up the price but unable to sold its own shares (but now PV could sold at cheaper price) stop sending big ads value like 10% interest in a day and creating more debt removal products like multiplayer game to slow the debt volume I had a plan to sell PV shares for PV to controlling the growth of debt https://www.mytrafficvalue.com/forum/brainstorm/suggestion_for_sellraise_pv_shares/1.html druth8x Traffic Value: $22,417.44153 United States 0 like this post 0 people 01/02/2015 08:10 @yallit, I thought so too...I was already planning this as I was trying to figure out at 4c a share, how many shares do I need to have in my account for each level. But, #1 in Jo's post starts off with: " 1) Users cannot fast sell their shares directly for BAP." So, that plan is a no go? Ok, I just figured it out. He's not eliminating the Share to BAP system. It's just that noone will have BAP to give away. At most they'll have 3100 BAP, and they want that for themselves.

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13